Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro RTX 4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 160W)
Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Quadro RTX 4000
+1440%
7119
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1005 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
36
192
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
144
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
160W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
