Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs RTX A4 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM RTX A4 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A4 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
RTX A4 Mobile
+1469%
7250
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1297 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
16
192
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
113.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.250 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.250 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
113.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GA107
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
