Quadro FX 550 vs TITAN Ada
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 550 and 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 550 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 800W)
TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
18432 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 2006
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1.15TB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
144
-
Shading Units
18432
8
TMUs
576
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
144
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
2.880 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1452 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
92.90 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
92.90 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1452 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
800W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
NV43
GPU Name
AD102
NV43 GL
GPU Variant
AD102-450-A1
Curie
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.146 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
154 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
