Quadro FX 580 vs Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 260W)
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4576 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 580
72
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
+19872%
14380
Graphics Card
Apr 2009
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
72
32
Shading Units
4608
16
TMUs
288
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
260W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G96C
GPU Name
TU102
G96-875-C1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
