Quadro FX 580 vs Quadro T2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 60W)
Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 580
72
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+4977%
3656
Graphics Card
Apr 2009
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
16
32
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96C
GPU Name
TU117
G96-875-C1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
