Quadro K2200 vs Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1650MHz vs 1124MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 68W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1439
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+105%
2957
Blender
Quadro K2200
127
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+203%
386
OctaneBench
Quadro K2200
34
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+108%
71
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1046 MHz
Base Clock
1395 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
640
Shading Units
896
40
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
68W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
TU117B
-
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
