Quadro K2200 vs RTX A6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 300W)
RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 60% (1800MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
10112 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1439
RTX A6000
+2590%
38710
Blender
Quadro K2200
127
RTX A6000
+4141%
5387
OctaneBench
Quadro K2200
34
RTX A6000
+1664%
600
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Oct 2020
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1046 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
84
640
Shading Units
10752
40
TMUs
336
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
201.6 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
604.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
38.71 TFLOPS
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.71 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
604.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
68W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GA102
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
