Quadro K2200 vs Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (68W vs 238W)
Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
+39%
1439
Tesla C2050
1028
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
640
Shading Units
448
40
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
68W
TDP
238W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
