Quadro K5000 SYNC vs GRID A100A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 400W)
GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2169
GRID A100A
+540%
13890
Graphics Card
Jan 2013
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
108
1536
Shading Units
6912
128
TMUs
432
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
400W
300 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GA100
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A