Quadro K5000 SYNC vs Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 150W)
Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2169
Quadro K5200
+63%
3553
Graphics Card
Jan 2013
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
1536
Shading Units
2304
128
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK110B
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
