Home Comparison Quadro K5000 SYNC vs RTX A4500 Embedded

Quadro K5000 SYNC vs RTX A4500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 122W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2169
RTX A4500 Embedded +559%
14310

Graphics Card

Jan 2013
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
46
1536
Shading Units
5888
128
TMUs
184
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

122W
TDP
80W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA104
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net