Quadro K5000 SYNC vs Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (122W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
+110%
2169
Tesla C2050
1028
Graphics Card
Jan 2013
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
1536
Shading Units
448
128
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
238W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
