Quadro NVS 290 vs AMD Instinct MI300X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
19440 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
29
AMD Instinct MI300X
+563348%
163400
Graphics Card
Oct 2007
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro NVS
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
192GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM3
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
19456
8
TMUs
880
4
ROPs
0
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS
Board Design
21W
TDP
750W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
MI300
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
146 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
