Quadro NVS 290 vs Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (34.14GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 21W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
29
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
+2106%
640
Graphics Card
Oct 2007
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro NVS
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
LPDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
34.14GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
4
16
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1280 GFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
640.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
320.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
21W
TDP
10W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GA10B
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
Unknown
127 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
