Quadro NVS 290 vs Quadro RTX 6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 260W)
Quadro RTX 6000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4592 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
29
Quadro RTX 6000
+56141%
16310
Graphics Card
Oct 2007
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
72
16
Shading Units
4608
8
TMUs
288
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
21W
TDP
260W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
