Quadro P600 vs Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 and 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P600 's Advantages
Boost Clock1557MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.13GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 40W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P600
+86%
1196
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
640
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1329 MHz
Base Clock
-
1557 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
34.14GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
24.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
37.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
18.68 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1280 GFLOPS
1196 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
640.0 GFLOPS
37.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
320.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
10W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GA10B
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
132 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
