Quadro P600 vs Quadro K610M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K610M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1557MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.13GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Quadro K610M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 40W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P600
+218%
1196
Quadro K610M
376
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1329 MHz
Base Clock
-
1557 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
192
24
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
24.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.920 GPixel/s
37.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.68 GTexel/s
18.68 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1196 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
376.3 GFLOPS
37.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
15.68 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GK208
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q2-B-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
