Quadro P600 vs Quadro M4000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1557MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 100W)
Quadro M4000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P600
1196
Quadro M4000M
+108%
2496
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P600
1105
Quadro M4000M
+121%
2446
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P600
374
Quadro M4000M
+200%
1122
OctaneBench
Quadro P600
23
Quadro M4000M
+195%
68
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1329 MHz
Base Clock
-
1557 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
1280
24
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
64
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
24.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
37.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.00 GTexel/s
18.68 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1196 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.496 TFLOPS
37.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q3-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
