Quadro P600 vs Quadro P5200 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 100W)
Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1747MHz vs 1557MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P600
1196
Quadro P5200 Mobile
+647%
8945
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1329 MHz
Base Clock
1557 MHz
1557 MHz
Boost Clock
1747 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
24.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.8 GPixel/s
37.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.5 GTexel/s
18.68 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
139.8 GFLOPS
1196 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.945 TFLOPS
37.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
279.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GP104
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
