Quadro P600 vs RTX A2000 12 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 and 12GB VRAM RTX A2000 12 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P600 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1557MHz vs 1200MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 70W)
RTX A2000 12 GB 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P600
1196
RTX A2000 12 GB
+567%
7987
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P600
1105
RTX A2000 12 GB
+427%
5834
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P600
374
RTX A2000 12 GB
+616%
2681
Blender
Quadro P600
122
RTX A2000 12 GB
+1445%
1885
OctaneBench
Quadro P600
23
RTX A2000 12 GB
+886%
227
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1329 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
1557 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
26
384
Shading Units
3328
24
TMUs
104
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
Theoretical Performance
24.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
37.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
18.68 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
1196 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
37.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GA106
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
12 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
