Quadro P600 vs RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 60W)
RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1612MHz vs 1557MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P600
1196
RTX A2000 Embedded
+590%
8253
Blender
Quadro P600
122
RTX A2000 Embedded
+1540%
2001
OctaneBench
Quadro P600
23
RTX A2000 Embedded
+1078%
271
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1329 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
1557 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
24.91 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
37.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
18.68 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
1196 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
37.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GA107S
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
132 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
