Quadro RTX 8000 vs Quadro FX 3500M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 260W)
Score
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-III
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
-
288
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
16
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.80 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
260W
TDP
45W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
G71
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
90 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.278 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0
