Quadro RTX 8000 vs Quadro FX 370 LP
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
4600 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000
+95841%
16310
Quadro FX 370 LP
17
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
1
4608
Shading Units
8
288
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.28 GFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
260W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
G98
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
