Quadro RTX 8000 vs Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
4416 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000
+3430%
16310
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
24
4608
Shading Units
192
288
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
24
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
Theoretical Performance
169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
260W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GT200B
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
