Quadro RTX 8000 vs Quadro P5000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1770MHz vs 1582MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Quadro P5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000
+151%
16310
Quadro P5000 Mobile
6480
Blender
Quadro RTX 8000
+420%
2844
Quadro P5000 Mobile
546
OctaneBench
Quadro RTX 8000
+185%
337
Quadro P5000 Mobile
118
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
1278 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
1582 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
16
4608
Shading Units
2048
288
TMUs
128
96
ROPs
64
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.2 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
202.5 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
101.2 GFLOPS
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.480 TFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
202.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
260W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GP104
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
N17E-Q5-A1
Turing
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
16 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
