Quadro RTX 8000 vs Radeon Instinct MI25
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1770MHz vs 1500MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 436.2GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (260W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000
+32%
16310
Radeon Instinct MI25
12290
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Jun 2017
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
1400 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
4096
288
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
64
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
260W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
Vega 10
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL
(215-0894124)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
