Quadro RTX 8000 vs Radeon Instinct MI50
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 322.3GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Radeon Instinct MI50 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 82% (3230MHz vs 1770MHz)
Lower TDP (150W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000
16310
Radeon Instinct MI50
+62%
26460
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
May 2025
Quadro
Generation
Navi IV
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
2220 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
3230 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
322.3GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
2048
288
TMUs
128
96
ROPs
64
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
206.7 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
413.4 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
52.92 TFLOPS
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.46 TFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
826.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
260W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
Navi 44
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 44 XT
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
4 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
Unknown
754 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
