Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1200 Mobile and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro T1200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 85% (1425MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (18W vs 150W)
Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T1200 Mobile
2918
Quadro K5200
+21%
3553
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
855 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
45.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
91.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
5.837 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.918 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
18W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GK110B
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
