Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus vs Intel Processor U301L
We compared two laptop CPUs: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus with 10 cores 3.4GHz and Intel Processor U301L with 5 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Higher specification of memory (8448 vs 5200)
Larger memory bandwidth (135GB/s vs 83.2GB/s)
Higher base frequency (3.4GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (42MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 10nm)
Intel Processor U301L 's Advantages
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 4.0)
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)
Score
General Parameters
Apr 2024
Release Date
Apr 2024
Qualcomm
Manufacturer
Intel
Laptop
Type
Laptop
ARMv9
Instruction Set
-
Snapdragon X
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake-PS
X1P-64-100
Processor Number
-
Custom
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Qualcomm Adreno X1
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 64EU
Oryon
Generation
Intel Processor (Raptor Lake)
Package
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
23 W
Power Consumption
15 W
80 W
Max Turbo Power Consumption
-
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C
Samsung TSMC
Foundry
Intel
mm²
Die Size
-
CPU Performance
10
Performance Cores
1
10
Performance Core Threads
2
3.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.2 GHz
-
Efficiency Cores
4
-
Efficiency Core Threads
4
-
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
900 MHz
-
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
1600 MHz
10
Total Core Count
5
10
Total Thread Count
6
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
34x
Multiplier
12.0
-
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
-
L2 Cache
1.25 MB per core
42 MB
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
LPDDR5X-8448
Memory Types
DDR4-3200, DDR5-5200
64 GB
Max Memory Size
-
8
Max Memory Channels
2
135 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
-
500 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
-
1200 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
1536
Shader Units
-
48
Texture Units
-
6
Raster Operation Units
-
6
Execution Units
-
Power Consumption
-
3.8 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-
