Radeon 3000 IGP vs Iris Graphics 6100
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 3000 IGP and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Graphics 6100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Graphics 6100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon 3000 IGP
28
Iris Graphics 6100
+2642%
768
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Sep 2014
TeraScale IGP
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
40
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
6
Theoretical Performance
1.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
1.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.00 GTexel/s
28.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
192.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
15W
Motherboard Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RS780
GPU Name
Broadwell GT3
RS780L
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 8.0
-
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
Unknown
85 mm²
Die Size
133 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
