Radeon 620 Mobile vs GeForce 9650M GS
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon 620 Mobile and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9650M GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon 620 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1024MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
352 additional rendering cores
GeForce 9650M GS 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
Lower TDP (29W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon 620 Mobile
+882%
786
GeForce 9650M GS
80
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Mar 2008
Mobility Radeon
Generation
GeForce 9M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
730 MHz
Base Clock
-
1024 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
32
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
8.192 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
24.58 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
786.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
786.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
49.15 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
29W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Polaris 24
GPU Name
G84
Polaris 24 XL
GPU Variant
NB9P-GS1-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0