Radeon 620 Mobile vs GeForce 9650M GT
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon 620 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 9650M GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon 620 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1024MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
352 additional rendering cores
GeForce 9650M GT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
Lower TDP (23W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon 620 Mobile
+824%
786
GeForce 9650M GT
85
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Aug 2008
Mobility Radeon
Generation
GeForce 9M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
730 MHz
Base Clock
-
1024 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
32
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
8.192 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
24.58 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
786.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
786.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
84.80 GFLOPS
49.15 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
23W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Polaris 24
GPU Name
G96C
Polaris 24 XL
GPU Variant
NB9P-GT
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0