Radeon HD 3200 Mobile IGP vs FirePro A300
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 3200 Mobile IGP and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro A300 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock905MHz
344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 3200 Mobile IGP
30
FirePro A300
+2216%
695
Graphics Card
Nov 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
TeraScale IGP
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
760 MHz
-
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
2
Compute Units
6
40
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
Theoretical Performance
1.520 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
1.520 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
30.40 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
65W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RS780
GPU Name
Devastator
RS780M
GPU Variant
A300
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 3
-
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
32 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
1.303 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
4.1
Shader Model
5.0
