Radeon HD 3200 Mobile IGP vs Radeon HD 8250 IGP
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 3200 Mobile IGP and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 8250 IGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon HD 8250 IGP 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock400MHz
88 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 3200 Mobile IGP
30
Radeon HD 8250 IGP
+240%
102
Graphics Card
Nov 2009
Release Date
May 2013
TeraScale IGP
Generation
Temash
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
400 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
2
Compute Units
2
40
Shading Units
128
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
Theoretical Performance
1.520 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
1.520 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
30.40 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
102.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.400 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
8W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RS780
GPU Name
Kalindi
RS780M
GPU Variant
Kalindi LP
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
-
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
1.178 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
110 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.0
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.3
