Radeon HD 4670 AGP vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 4670 AGP and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon HD 4670 AGP 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
104 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (59W vs 182W)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4670 AGP
480
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
+11%
536
Graphics Card
Jul 2009
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon R700
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
320
Shading Units
216
32
TMUs
72
8
ROPs
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
6.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
59W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV730
GPU Name
GT200
RV730 XT
(215-0719047)
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0