Radeon HD 7350 OEM PCI vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 7350 OEM PCI and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon HD 7350 OEM PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 134W)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1032MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7350 OEM PCI
104
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
+1424%
1585
Graphics Card
Jan 2012
Release Date
Mar 2013
Southern Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
980 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1032 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
144.2GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
80
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
24
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.51 GPixel/s
5.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.05 GTexel/s
104.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.585 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
66.05 GFLOPS
Board Design
19W
TDP
134W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
GK106-240-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1