Radeon HD 7640G IGP vs GeForce 320M Mac Edition
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 7640G IGP and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon HD 7640G IGP 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock655MHz
208 additional rendering cores
GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7640G IGP
+268%
335
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
91
Graphics Card
May 2012
Release Date
Apr 2010
Trinity
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
496 MHz
Base Clock
-
655 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
256
Shading Units
48
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
Theoretical Performance
5.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
10.48 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
335.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
23W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Devastator Lite
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
-
32 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
Shader Model
4.1
