Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs GMA 3100
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 8400 IGP and 0System Shared VRAM GMA 3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon HD 8400 IGP 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
128 additional rendering cores
GMA 3100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 25W)
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
May 2007
Kabini
Generation
GMA Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
FSB
Clock Speeds
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
153.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
9.600 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
25W
TDP
13W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Kalindi
GPU Name
Bearlake
-
GPU Variant
Bearlake-G+ (G33)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.178 billion
Transistors
Unknown
110 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
3.0
