Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 8400 IGP and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 6200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock1100MHz
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 25W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 8400 IGP
154
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
+448%
845
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Sep 2014
Kabini
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
6
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.80 GTexel/s
153.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
844.8 GFLOPS
9.600 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
15W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Kalindi
GPU Name
Broadwell GT3e
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 8.0
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.178 billion
Transistors
Unknown
110 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.0
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
