Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs Jetson Nano GPU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 8400 IGP and 0System Shared VRAM Jetson Nano GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Jetson Nano GPU 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock921MHz
Lower TDP (10W vs 25W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 8400 IGP
154
Jetson Nano GPU
+53%
236
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
May 2019
Kabini
Generation
Tegra
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
640 MHz
-
Boost Clock
921 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
128
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.74 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.74 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
471.6 GFLOPS
153.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
235.8 GFLOPS
9.600 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
10W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Kalindi
GPU Name
GM20B
-
GPU Variant
TM660M-A2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
20 nm
1.178 billion
Transistors
2 billion
110 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
5.3
6.3
Shader Model
6.4
