Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs Radeon HD 4250 IGP
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 8400 IGP and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 4250 IGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon HD 8400 IGP 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
88 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 8400 IGP
+250%
154
Radeon HD 4250 IGP
44
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Mar 2010
Kabini
Generation
TeraScale IGP
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
2
Compute Units
2
128
Shading Units
40
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.240 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.240 GTexel/s
153.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
9.600 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
25W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
Graphics Processor
Kalindi
GPU Name
RS880
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
-
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.178 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
110 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
