Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs Arc A750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5728
Arc A750
+200%
17200
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Oct 2022
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
3584
144
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
DG2-512
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
