Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs B200 SXM 192 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 1000W)
B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.10TB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
14592 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5728
B200 SXM 192 GB
+983%
62080
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Jan 2024
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Server Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4.10TB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
2304
Shading Units
16896
144
TMUs
528
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
1000W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GB100
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Blackwell
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
104 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
10.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A