Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs CMP 170HX 8 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 8GB VRAM CMP 170HX 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
CMP 170HX 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.49TB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5728
CMP 170HX 8 GB
+120%
12630
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Sep 2021
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1.49TB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
2304
Shading Units
4480
144
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GA100
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ampere
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A