Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs FirePro V5800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (74W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+418%
5728
FirePro V5800
1104
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
10
2304
Shading Units
800
144
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.04 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.60 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1104 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
74W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
Juniper
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Juniper XT GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
