Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
2288 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+12918%
5728
GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2
44
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Mar 2011
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
2304
Shading Units
16
144
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GT218S
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1