Home Comparison Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs GeForce GT 545 OEM

Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs GeForce GT 545 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 545 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2160 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 545 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +1043%
5728
GeForce GT 545 OEM
501

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
May 2011
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
2304
Shading Units
144
144
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.226 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.90 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
501.4 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
41.78 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
105W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
GF116
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
GF116-110-KA-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net