Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+853%
5728
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
601
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Mar 2011
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
902 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.73GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
2304
Shading Units
192
144
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.264 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.06 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
601.3 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.11 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
106W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GF116
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
GF116-200-KA-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
