Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs GeForce RTX 4060 AD106
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock2460MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (272.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (115W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5728
GeForce RTX 4060 AD106
+163%
15110
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Apr 2024
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1830 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2460 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2125 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
272.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
2304
Shading Units
3072
144
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
24 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
118.1 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
236.2 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.11 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.11 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
236.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
115W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
AD106
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
AD106-155-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
22.9 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
188 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
