Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs GeForce RTX 4090 D
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 425W)
GeForce RTX 4090 D 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1008GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
12288 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5728
GeForce RTX 4090 D
+1183%
73540
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Dec 2023
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2280 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1008GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
114
2304
Shading Units
14592
144
TMUs
456
32
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
456
-
RT Cores
114
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
72 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
443.5 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1149 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
73.54 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.54 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1149 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
425W
600 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
AD102
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
AD102-250-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7